The Coming New World Order - Whose Vision Will Prevail?

The Coming New World Order-Whose Vision Will Prevail?
by David T. Pyne, Esq., Columnist and Legal Analyst

August 1, 2002

Columnist David Pyne The term, "New World Order," has been used by totalitarian tyrants from Hitler to Jiang Zemin to describe a globalist utopian superstate in which all resistance to a more or less all-powerful world government and those who control it has been essentially vanquished and war between competing states, which would be transformed into mere provinces of this world superstate has been abolished entirely. More recently, President George H.W. Bush used it during the Gulf War to describe a world led by the incipient world government known as the United Nations, which he sought to empower.

Today, there is a struggle being waged between two competing visions of a New World Order. The Eastern vision would consist of a world effectively dominated by the Sino-Russian axis of nations. The other is a one-world government dominated by the Western powers now being promoted by the Bush Administration, which is staffed by hundreds of members of the one-world government promoting Council on Foreign Relations from the President's top advisors on down. Both visions would establish a world government that would be largely socialist in nature. Both would involve the large-scale surrender of our constitutional freedoms and sovereignty to international institutions like the UN. However, these visions are more or less mutually exclusive.

The question is what will determine whose New World Order vision will prevail? Ultimately, the side whose vision dominates will be the one that induces the other to unilaterally disarm in the face of increasing national security threats as the West is now merrily doing. At this point, the future of the world is a grim one as the Sino-Russian alliance grows stronger and the US-led Western alliance continues to disarm and become increasingly accommodationist towards their would-be adversaries. Under the leadership of President George W. Bush, the correlation of forces is beginning to shift rapidly against the United States and in favor of our enemies. This fact will probably come as a surprise to most Americans who account for the President's current artificially high poll numbers stemming from his commendable military victory against the Taleban in Afghanistan.

The historic signature of the Sino-Russian Alliance Treaty on Friendship and Cooperation in July 2001 aimed against the US was one of the biggest recent steps taken towards the realization of the Eastern vision of a New World Order. The next major step towards the achievement of both the Western and especially the Eastern vision of a New World Order will be full implementation of the recently signed Treaty of Moscow. Given the Russian record of violating every treaty it has ever signed, the implementation of this onerous treaty will most likely serve to unilaterally disarm the United States of three-fourths of its strategic nuclear deterrent, while leaving the bulk of the Russian strategic nuclear arsenal intact. This, in turn, will have the effect of eliminating the US as a global superpower and thus serve to increase the relative power of the Sino-Russian alliance. It will also go far to make the world safe for nuclear war and/or nuclear blackmail by vastly increasing the current Russian superiority in offensive nuclear and strategic defensive might over the United States.

Mr. Bush and his globalist anti-nuke advisors apparently believe that Russia and Communist China can be trusted strategic partners who will support the US efforts to contain the very rogue states that they have armed to the teeth with ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction to use as proxies against the US. However, the US strategic nuclear deterrent has served as a far more reliable guarantor of the nuclear peace, which it has successfully kept during the last five and a half decades. Once it has been decimated, there will be nothing left to stop the Sino-Russian alliance from supplanting the US as the dominant military power on the planet, a development which would be nothing less than Pax Sovietica.

The unilateral nuclear disarmament of the US is a longtime Russian objective-indeed it is perhaps the paramount foreign policy objective of Russian foreign policy equal in importance to their goal of reuniting the Soviet Union. It is also the surest and swiftest road to the achievement of the Sino-Russian vision of a New World Order. President Bush's rationale in gutting the US nuclear arsenal is the implementation of State Department Document 7277 entitled, Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, written in 1961 modified many times since. This policy directive calls for the US to reduce its military to a force capable of nothing but internal security, disarm itself of its nuclear weaponry and surrender many of them to the United Nations and a UN Peace Force, which would then become the most powerful military force in the world, an outcome the Russians would probably welcome.

Of course, there is one other possible outcome, which is that both visions of a New World Order will fail. A triumph for the cause of freedom, independence and national sovereignty in the US can be made possible only if concerned Americans unite to defeat globalist politicians and elect conservative visionaries who will put America's interests first for a change and keep her defenses strong. This will require the withdrawal of the US of the United Nations and other anti-American globalist institutions. It would also require the retention of our strategic nuclear arsenal at current levels as advocated by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and the construction of a robust national missile defense system of sufficient size and scope to deter and defend against a full scale Russian nuclear first strike, something that the Bush Administration has said it would not do. As Patrick J. Buchanan so memorably stated during his last two presidential runs, these commendable actions would "bring the New World Order crashing down."

One can only pray that freedom triumphs in the end, but for now freedom is on the wane and America is on a path which, if left unchanged, may well lead it to follow the Roman Empire into historical oblivion. Only the committed action of millions of concerned and politically active American patriots united in their determination to make this God's country once again will be able to ensure that our beloved country averts this dismal fate. ***

David T. Pyne, Esq. is a national security expert who works as an International Programs Manager in the Department of the Army responsible for the countries of the former Soviet Union and the Middle East among others. He is also a licensed attorney and former Army Reserve Officer. In addition, he holds an MA in National Security Studies from Georgetown University. Mr. Pyne currently serves as Executive Vice President of the Virginia Republican Assembly. He is also a member of the Center for Emerging National Security Affairs based in Washington, D.C. Mr. Pyne serves as a columnist for American-Partisan.com , OpinioNet.net and America's Voices. He is also a regular contributor for Patriotist.com. In addition, his articles have appeared on Etherzone.com, Sierratimes.com, OriginalDissent.com and AmericanReformation.org where he serves as a national security policy analyst.

Republication and distribution encouraged with copyright notices intact.